Any member of the household who is subject to a lifetime registration requirement under a state sex offender registration program.
June 2013: Department for Education and Child Development A member of the media requested access to documents relating to the arrest of a government school staff member for charges of a sexual nature. .May 2015: Urban Renewal Authority Ms Vickie Chapman MP requested access to: All valuations undertaken for land identified in west sussex local papers the Gillman Master Plan received by, or created by, Renewal SA for the period 2009 to present. .During the external review process the applicant confirmed that he did not wish to pursue access to information concerning personal details and, therefore, clause 6(1) was excluded from the Ombudsmans external review, and redactions to personal information remained in place. .HUD administers Federal aid to local housing authorities that manage the housing for low-income residents at rents they can afford.The Ombudsman did not find the documents were exempt and reversed the Ministers determination.2017, december 2017: Adelaide Hills Council, the applicant sought access to the number of property inspections undertaken and number of notices issued by the council, broken down by postcode, in relation to fire safety form July 2014 to June 2015. .Because the debt is lower, a tax credit property can in turn offer lower, more affordable rents.The applicant did not pursue access to documents 4A and.Find Out More, we provide an amazing set of API's that we can help you integrate!
The Ombudsman reversed the determination of the agency.
The agency identified nine documents as falling within the scope of the applicants request and partially refused access on the basis of clauses 4(2) and 6(1). .




Access was refused to each document on the basis they were exempt pursuant to clause 1(1 b). .Clauses sex date pages 7(1 b) and 7(1 c) were considered to be applicable to portions of material but to a far lesser extent than submitted by the agency. .During the external review process the applicant confirmed that he did not wish to pursue access to information concerning personal details and, therefore, clause 6(1) was excluded from the Ombudsmans external review. .The agency identified two documents within the scope of the applicants request. .The agency identified one document within scope of the applicants request. .The agency relied on section 20(1 b) and clauses 6(1 7(1 a 7(1 b 9(1 a i) and 10(1) to refuse access to 61 documents, or parts thereof, while six documents were released in full.The Ombudsman determined that clauses 4(2 a vi) and (b) were applicable to some of the material identified by the agency as concerning security and emergency management. .February 2010: Minister for Health The Hon Rob Lucas MLC requested documents referring to SA Progressive Business since 2005.The Ombudsman also considered whether some of the documents were exempt as documents subject to legal professional privilege (clause 10(1).The agency submitted that clauses 4(2 6(1 7(1 a 7(1 b 7(1 c 9(1) and 13(1 a) were applicable to the documents. .January 2016: Department for Education and Child Development The applicant sought access to a report produced by the former Police Commissioner, Mr Mal Hyde in about August 2014.



A separate interested party also submitted that certain documents were exempt under exemption clause 8(1). .
These determinations are also available from.

[L_RANDNUM-10-999]